For over thirty years, we’ve been helping technology companies to more effectively address their customer lifecycle management issues. We bring a focus on customer retention and increasing per-customer profitability to our work that is built upon a solid foundation of industry-wide experience, research and hands-on expertise. While the specific tools and services we apply will depend upon the needs of the particular project, the overall process remains consistent: Assess, Design, and Build.
Assess
Successful and effective decision-making relies on a cornerstone of accurate and up-to-date knowledge. Mikael Blaisdell & Associates have been doing successful assessment projects for all sizes and types of companies all over the world for decades, giving senior management teams access to actionable information and specific recommendations.
Design
What service products could be added to your company’s portfolio to significantly increase revenue and encourage customer retention? What organizational resources would be required, and at what level of investment? If the decision was made to proceed, what would the project plan look like? The future-state blueprint pulls all of the pieces together and serves as the basis for implementation.
Build
As seasoned senior managers know all too well, designing a better approach is only the beginning of the real work. To be effective, the team has to be brought to adopt the new approach company-wide as their own. The hands-on experience of Mikael Blaisdell & Associates, combined with our reputation and standing in the SaaS, contact center and services sectors, is a significant asset that can be deployed to reduce the time required for the project and improve the chances for success.
Resources
- Services for Software Companies
- Services for SaaS/Cloud Firms
- Services for Support/Success Technology Vendors
More Information
For more information on specific services offered by MB&A to assist you to increase your company’s overall sustainable profitability level and customer retention, please join us for a complimentary Office Hours discussion.
“It’s what you don’t know about your customer relationships that can cause you to lose them.”
–The SaaS Customer Retention QuickStat
Revised: January 9, 2012









Unfortunately, effective financial management can be a challenge in the on-demand world. While a SaaS vendor’s infrastructure expenses are reasonably predictable, there is another significant cost factor that is not so easy to track. The necessity of customer retention demands active maintenance of the relationship, and every touch point of that effort carries a cost. If a company has no consistent strategy for effectively dealing with all of those interactions across all departments, the financial consequences can be substantial.
Sales professionals know about conversation management, and are motivated to be efficient. They’re taught to ask for the order, and to stay focused until the customer signs the contract. While not all conversations with a prospective customer are directly productive, salespeople are generally good about extracting value from even indirectly productive interactions in the form of useful positioning and information. If you can’t get the order now, get permission for the next contact and any data that might help you towards the close next time. Keep the pipeline full and always moving yourself towards the commission goals.
The ring that signals an incoming telephone call, or the chime that announces receipt of a new email, is another kind of alert as well — the company’s profitability is also on the line. It’s a very safe bet in most SaaS companies that such interactions have not been included in the product definition or pricing calculations. The omission can be expensive. The number, timing and duration of incoming customer requests and the desired responsiveness of the team that receives them determines staffing levels. As the number of customers increases, so will the volume of touch-points; the mathematics are very straightforward. The staff then has to be augmented to handle the larger load. If no one is keeping an eye on strategy, utilization levels and efficiency of deployment, it’s not at all hard to go negative very quickly. What’s worse, the change from profitability to loss may remain obscured even as the effect accelerates.


